=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. Our study states it all depends for the gender . . . in order to a place – JNO Construction & Design

At JNO Construction we don’t build houses, we build homes.

Call us on (310) 363-7980

Los Angeles, CA  

Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM

Top
Image Alt

Our study states it all depends for the gender . . . in order to a place

Our study states it all depends for the gender . . . in order to a place

My personal past article, on what happens ranging from two people after they hook, produced plenty of statements how folks connect up with different hopes and you will purposes. Therefore, I thought i’d generate this information to generally share specific study we enjoys thereon material.

Significantly more more youthful men (19 per cent) than just ladies (ten percent) and additionally ideally need their hookups to lead so you’re able to no further get in touch with on partner

best dating apps and sites

Once the multiple subscribers pointed out, there was justification to believe that people differ as to what they ideally require using their hookups. Centered on evolutionary theories, relaxed sex is much more advantageous for men compared to women in regards to breeding and you will genetic dissemination. As well as, within latest neighborhood, you’ll find socializing challenges for ladies in order to really worth mental intimacy over sexual fulfillment, as well as for guys to help you honor sex more closeness. Also, you will find sexual double-criteria, in which women can be shamed in order to have informal sex, but guys are praised for it.

According to these types of concepts, men could be likely to be than just women to connect assured that Gori wife it will end up being a single-day find, without subsequent experience of brand new partner. And you may men get with greater regularity promise this new connection causes went on sexual wedding only (i.age., repeated hookups, however, no emotional ties into the lover). On the other hand, feminine is generally apt to be than dudes to link which have this new hopes that it will ultimately end up in a partnership for the lover.

To understand more about the newest authenticity of those facts, Eliza Weitbrecht and i examined what more youthful men and you may women state they ideally need from their hookups – Is it no longer contact with the fresh lover? Went on sexual encounters only? Relationship? A partnership? Within a more impressive research blogged inside Personal Relationship, i expected female and male youngsters in order to writeup on what consequences it viewed as good for their hookups generally, as well as its latest link specifically.

Regarding performance, many of the predict gender differences kept true. Thirty-eight percent off more youthful men revealed that continued sexual involvement try an appropriate consequence of their hookups as a whole, than the merely sixteen per cent out of women. Which variation was even way more striking whenever asked about the ideal outcome of the latest connections: 63 per cent of males, but only eleven per cent of women said it expected you to definitely connections would cause continued sexual knowledge just.

In contrast, a greater ratio of females (64.5 percent) than just men (thirty-five per cent) essentially wanted their hookups overall to guide in order to close involvement. Once more, the latest gender differences was even much more noticable once they was requested about their most recent hookup: sixty percent of women in the place of 13 percent of men said a beneficial partnership is the right consequence of you to sexual run into.

Together, such findings suggest that there are good gender differences in exactly what young adults need using their hookups. Men and women variations are in range that have evolutionary and socialization-created theories, along with of several laypeople’s criterion you to guys basically simply want sex, while female want to mode a relationship. As such, they high light just how young women general tends to be disadvantaged of the most recent society close hookups on university campuses. The numerous women who vow their hookups often evolve on the a dating is impractical having those hopes know, especially because it’s unrealistic that the child they hook with has got the same wants.

Indeed, exactly as many men (once more, on the one-third) told you it if at all possible wanted its hookups as a whole to lead to a connection to your lover

At the same time, yet not, this type of conclusions should not be misunderstood to say that the guys simply want sex. If you’re in the one or two-thirds of men did hope you to they’d simply have continued sexual involvement with the newest link partner, it matter try most shorter – to you to-3rd – when they had been revealing on their hookups as a whole.

Similarly, never assume all women are in search of matchmaking to change of the hookups. If or not inquired about the hookups overall or just around the most present hookup especially, to 35-forty per cent from women mentioned that a suitable consequences are things aside from a romantic relationship – sometimes no further exposure to the brand new companion, friendship only, or continued sexual experience just.

Therefore, while we can tell a large number of (if not most) younger men connect trying to find sex only, and some (or even extremely) young women link assured that it’ll lead to anything much more, this is not usually the way it is. As an alternative, our studies suggest that regarding the a 3rd off younger men hook upwards dreaming about a romance towards the connections lover, and you may a 3rd of women would not like its hookup to guide to something far more.

Post a Comment