=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. Getting a first big date, anything had been supposed fairly well – JNO Construction & Design

At JNO Construction we don’t build houses, we build homes.

Call us on (310) 363-7980

Los Angeles, CA  

Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM

Top
Image Alt

Getting a first big date, anything had been supposed fairly well

Getting a first big date, anything had been supposed fairly well

To conquer my reservations in the taking walks the new line ranging from matchmaking and prostitution, I advised me one to such questions were the result of public conditioning

mail order bride tv

Seeking give-up their own day job but take care of a constant earnings, the writer entered a web site where steeped elderly dudes store getting girlfriends. Is the fact thus wrong?

We were at the Megu, a costly Japanese eatery inside Midtown Manhattan, dining really well ready Kobe chicken. My personal mate, an abundant finance variety of, try advising me exactly about themselves and you will posing inquiries one to advised he was looking me personally. Up coming, matter-of-factly, the guy told you, Whether We fulfilled your on the site otherwise at the Basic, you might cost me at the least ten huge thirty days.

The theory one combination money and you will mating try naturally bad, I reasoned, was good fallacy considering our very own cumulative addiction to moralizing sex

Your website he was making reference to is actually Trying to Plan, an internet circle one to pairs anyone having tips (sugar daddies and you can glucose mommies) with those people, usually far young, seeking all of them (sugar babies). I got become a member 2-3 weeks prior to, partly as the a social try out and you will partly out-of genuine frustration. I happened to be sick and tired of my business, and this offered nothing up mobility, and you may is contemplating stopping it to pursue my personal aim of to-be the full-day freelance publisher. Carrying me personally straight back was in fact my lack of savings and you will my concern from sacrificing a regular paycheck. If i got a hefty allocation from a good-sized benefactor, no matter if, We realized that we might take this new leap easily.

The very thought of wealthy seniors support stressed younger of them was absolutely nothing innovative, whatsoever-search what Peggy Guggenheim performed for Jackson Pollock and/or Tuohys performed getting N.F.L. star Michael Oher. Just what exactly if i must tap into my interior geisha in order to safer an effective patron?

Mating rituals between the exchange out of presents-getting they hunks out of chicken, short fishes, otherwise diamond bands-is instilled in several kinds, from apes to help you seabirds, to people. It is only natural for men to a target cues so you’re able to virility for example teens and you can beauty, and for females becoming attracted to screens off resources. As to the reasons sneer on thought silver diggers such as for instance Heather Mills and/or later Anna Nicole Smith if they had been merely after the their evolutionary instincts?

With all of so it in your mind, I composed my Looking to Arrangement reputation. Since i have was still a little while unwilling on how far I’d feel willing to simply take my personal check out, I authorized utilizing the pseudonym Annabelle Walker. This site, and this introduced from inside the 2006, enjoys throughout the 420,000 professionals, at which around one-3rd try sugar daddies and two-thirds try glucose babies (glucose mommies make up lower than 1 percent) Cuban damer pГҐ jakt etter ekteskap. If you are glucose daddies pay $ four weeks for a paid membership (or $step one,200 thirty day period getting Diamond Pub certification, and that need verification of your own net value as a consequence of tax-go back investigation), since a sugar child I found myself able to join for free. We submitted a couple images and you may detailed some general factual statements about myself, and i also mentioned discover, amount flexible from the space you to definitely asks what you’re wanting. (Seeking to Plan dresses the problem of prostitution by producing the brand new exchange regarding intimacy and you will companionship to have merchandise.) We grabbed an intense air and you may printed my personal character, determined to target New yorkdepending solitary dudes saying becoming worth at least $ten million.

However, back to Megu and you may my time, whom I will phone call Hank. (During the this information, I’ve altered this new labels of the men We old to safeguard their confidentiality.) Initial, he received my suspicion with the cocky, typo-ridden message the guy sent me for the Trying Arrangement: i do believe i possibly waht your r in search of; read my reputation assuming your roentgen curious miss me personally a line..your cannot become distressed. However watched their web well worth-$100 mil-and the matter he was willing to invest in an effective girlfriend: $10,000 so you can $20,000 per month. That might be adequate to defense my personal living expenses and leave me which have many inside throw away money. The remainder of Hank’s reputation, and therefore said that he try center-old, starred activities, and you will did during the financing, are off reduced focus.

Post a Comment