=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. Additionally, that it finding reveals that on the web matchmaking overcome this new traps implemented because of the geographical restrictions – JNO Construction & Design

At JNO Construction we don’t build houses, we build homes.

Call us on (310) 363-7980

Los Angeles, CA  

Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM

Top
Image Alt

Additionally, that it finding reveals that on the web matchmaking overcome this new traps implemented because of the geographical restrictions

Additionally, that it finding reveals that on the web matchmaking overcome this new traps implemented because of the geographical restrictions

Consistent with the conclusions out-of prior to training (e.g. Mesch and Talmud (2006) ), this study discovered that the grade of all three version of relationship improved due to the fact relationship install over the years.

Nevertheless, the caliber of on line relationships remained somewhat less than compared to off-line relationships and blended matchmaking even after 24 months regarding go after-upwards

caring dad orders his mail-order-bride to take care of son

With regards to proximity, the analysis unearthed that traditional nearest and dearest existed nearer to one another than mixed-function and online family members. This means that one to inside the on the internet and combined-mode relationships, real geographical proximity is actually quicker vital that you to-be household members.

Regarding resemblance https://kissbridesdate.com/tajikistan-women/, the analysis learned that the level of sensed resemblance is actually all the way down during the online friendships compared to blended-setting and you can offline friendships. However, the effect away from similarity for the top-notch relationship was higher to possess on the internet relationships than for mixed-setting and you can traditional relationships. These show imply that although the quantity of resemblance is actually low in on the internet friendships, similarity try a very crucial determinant out of relationship high quality inside on line relationships compared to others two relationship classes (Antheunis, Valkenburg and you may Peter, 2012) .

So it chapter talked about how on line spaces are used about context from matchmaking development and also the creation of friendship ties by the setting off ICT. They emphasised the role away from on the internet communication from inside the bringing an alternative and you will complementary place to have relationship development, considering the specific limits one youngsters deal with. These are generally geographic, constituting an effective contextual burden one encourages certain teens to show in order to the web based to seek other individuals who express its certain hobbies otherwise disagree within racial/cultural record and you can societal qualities. Beyond architectural constraints, it learned that those with specific character properties, also introversion, self-design and you may connection style, was basically alot more attracted to building relationship online.

Such as for example, Stanton-Salazar and you will Urso-Spina (2005) learned that low-close, cross-gender on the web relationships anywhere between adolescents ended up a significant source of public support

Heterogeneity inside adolescents’ social support systems, taking place with greater regularity if the supply of your own friendship is on the net, has actually developmental implications that need after that analysis. It afforded psychological service, particularly for males. Whether your Internet decrease friendship gender segregation having younger teens, this may influence the whole process of relationships and you can first-time sexual relationships down the road. Another potential feeling is within the very early connection with folks of varied cultural and you will racial groups as well as varying governmental opinions. If this sounds like verified in future look, the internet is extremely planning to become a central agent of socialisation, which includes are incorporated into the understanding of youthfulness socialisation.

The brand new division inside research of one’s virtual about actual really does not accurately need this new lived personal experience and you may title negotiations out-of teenagers inside their socialisation techniques or perhaps in the belonging to fellow teams, neither can it cover the fresh complexity in which off-line and online areas is actually collectively inserted. Investigating exactly how these types of rooms try collectively inserted, additionally the complex characteristics of those relationship, was an important area for coming search so you’re able to know very well what it means to possess pupils in the twenty-first century.

The development of ICT on adolescents’ label management, individual organizations and you will relationship creation seemingly have altered the smoothness out of private and you can public places, constituted of the adolescents’ circumstances with the and you may within monitor. Nowadays apparently there was an online and off-line consolidation and you will interpersonal matchmaking are continually moving as a result of social support systems anywhere between on the web, offline and you will mixed interaction depending on spatial, mental or any other limits inside the lifestyle. Research conducted recently of consolidation of on the internet, blended and you can traditional personal connections determined that there was evidence you to victims having higher quantities of online/traditional consolidation have highest lifetime pleasure, better extraversion, a lot more confident thinking of your Websites and less loneliness (Antheunis, Valkenburg and you will Peter, 2012) . Coming research which have across the country representative examples from other regions will benefit which career by permitting between-country comparisons, and also to prove when the this type of phenomena apply at people in numerous contexts.

Post a Comment