=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. I been having LunchDates just after carrying out internet dating and you may seeking to find the correct people – JNO Construction & Design

At JNO Construction we don’t build houses, we build homes.

Call us on (310) 363-7980

Los Angeles, CA  

Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM

Top
Image Alt

I been having LunchDates just after carrying out internet dating and you may seeking to find the correct people

I been having LunchDates just after carrying out internet dating and you may seeking to find the correct people

by
Nevjesta za internetsku poЕЎta

I been having LunchDates just after carrying out internet dating and you may seeking to find the correct people

LunchDates might have been a dependable term during the top-notch relationships for more than forty years, happily maintaining Bbb Certification while the 1987. Our very own A good+ rating regarding the Better business bureau was a testament to the commitment to brilliance, with 99% of our own recommendations reflecting the brand new outstanding abilities the clients features hit. We focus on enabling unmarried masters for the Boston find success from inside the its like life, exactly as they actually do in their jobs. Listed here are certain feedback away from subscribers with knowledgeable all of our expert matchmaking services during the Boston.

We got the new dive with the working with Supper Dates shortly after decades out of suffering from the fresh programs and never meeting the kind of guy I was trying to find within the a pub or any other public environment. I fulfilled a good amount of higher dudes just who searched a lot out of packets, however for you to need or other, just weren’t the only. Food Schedules produced the process simple, and you can that which you try very elite group. For each big date was at a trendy venue that we could have never ever selected however, loved, and you may bookings was indeed usually off the beaten track for us. I’m so glad We leading the process that have Meal Dates because the just after several months out of schedules, We satisfied the person of my personal goals (and!) He advised just after dos.five years of relationship, and now we keeps put all of our wedding date to get just five age out-of that earliest dinner date. The group was wonderful, and worry therefore deeply from the letting you see your cheerfully actually after. If you are searching into style of matchmaking you are aware your deserve, reach out today – believe the method – you’ll not regret it!

Jill along with her people really paid attention to myself and you will everything i wanted…. they discover me personally the guy out of my hopes and dreams to your next suits. He is it’s great and you may what i wanted!! He has proposed, I told you sure, and we are thinking our life together. I will not delighted. Thank you, thank-you, thanks!!

LunchDates Critiques & Feedback

I’ve been having LD for many years towards the & out of, in every that time it never ever shortly after quit advocating & looking back at my part, up to it receive brand new woman of my desires, who You will find proposed in order to & this lady has accepted. I will never ever thank LD adequate.

Relationship via programs grabbed a lot of effort. Food dates grabbed every workout of one’s processes. We found very nice men. Only a few had been a fit, but in the finish, I fulfilled an individual who I never might have found ahead of exactly who try type and you can caring. We enjoy how they listened and you may have been non-judgmental throughout the my reflections towards dates.

Ready to Discover Their Meets?

Immediately following no profits playing with on the web features and you can apps to meet up anyone I decided to render LD a go. When i is looking dates on my own I realized that whether or not We realized everything i wanted – I would get caught up on the on line profiles, stories and you can pictures and you will left conference people who were not an excellent match. LD was higher as they most listened to what i need and you may paired me personally with high top quality people. They performed a great job finding me individuals I would not provides fulfilled if you don’t and you can couple of years later we’re 30 days off getting married. Triumph!

I was completely out of my personal safe place joining LD. I really don’t even for example Food otherwise relationship. Just like the on the web Prijava ДЌlana indonesiancupida isn’t really for me personally, We works right through the day plus don’t such as for instance fulfilling visitors at a bar, I thought i’d bring LD an attempt. In my interviews Laura remaining claiming, I’ve the perfect guy to you personally, I imagined she was just placing me personally relaxed. She put us right up right away, I did so matter they somewhat, considering possibly he worked for LD and you will would definitely view me out the way i is given that a date. I was extremely worried visiting the date, and this LD prepared. A lot of time facts short, he was such as for example a gentleman, put myself close to ease, such a sweetheart, zero online game, full of respect. Laura try proper…….he was primary match personally. I’d highly recommend LD, extremely professional and personal.

SHARE

Post a Comment