=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. Lesbian Dating Sites – The Best And Worst – JNO Construction & Design

At JNO Construction we don’t build houses, we build homes.

Call us on (310) 363-7980

Los Angeles, CA  

Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM

Top
Image Alt

Lesbian Dating Sites – The Best And Worst

Lesbian Dating Sites – The Best And Worst

If you’re single and not online dating, then you should be. But take heed! Not all are homo-friendly. So before you get going, here’s what you need to know about the best (and worst) available –

Overall – This newbie app has stormed onto the scene, it’s famous “swipe right” concept asking you to essentially thumbs up or thumbs down women in your area. You set the “prowl-o-meter” to how long you’re willing to go to find your girl, then start flicking through endless pictures, vapidly deciding which ones you may or may not like based on their face. Like you don’t even have to fill in any boxes. Just sync and go.

Best Feature – Linked to Facebook. Now although this makes many of us cringe they honestly don’t post “I AM INCREDIBLY DESPERATE” all over your page. In fact they don’t touch it at all. Which, depressingly, resulted in me being matched with my own twin sister, begging the question; Why did we both swipe right?!

Also – Tinder is bisexual friendly. So if you choose to be sent pictures of male genitalia via your iPhone then you are free as a bird to do so.

They just use your info to match you via some clever Tinder spell

hitta en postorderbrud

(I’m not joking, this is all men do. It’s astounding how men feel that the reasonable online equivalent of a handshake is a selfie of their premium product. If you weren’t lesbian before, then you sure as hell will be after seeing an array of your local members. Members. Consider yourself warned.)

You know when you’re in a gay club, and the best you can usually hope for is a few fleeting yet purposeful glances from interested women, before they quickly flick their eyes away when you catch them at it? Like, no one goes and talks to each other, we all just stand in a room in various huddles looking out of the corners of our eyes until we’re all drunk enough for the “feel each other up on the dancefloor” portion of the evening. Who says romance is dead, eh?

Just an inbox full of women who have said “Yes!” to each other, but now no-one is actually making the first move. It’s hilarious, too, because you BOTH KNOW you are interested. It’s essentially a never ending game of chicken. We may as well all post pictures of the nonchalant sides of our far-too-cool faces as our profile pictures and save ourselves the trouble. I’ve resorted to using it to send my sister lesbian themed hashtags I find hilarious, ie #KeepYourYuletideGay and #YourFaceOrMine.

Overall – This lesbian specific app is based on a Facebook-style profile idea where you post and preen on a news feed style system until someone talks to you. HER (Daatch) is completely for women, and you have to give it to them, they know lesbians. No hiding in the corner here. if you’ve shown interest in someone, they’re going to know about it. Everything you do or click on comes up as a notification, so browse wisely

Best Feature – OK, so they do know lesbians, and well. There’s a lot to do within the actual app, as it encourages users to create an up to date profile that moves and interacts just like a Facebook page, plus an online blog written by the team themselves with some pretty decent content. Cleverly, this keeps you and the person you’re chatting to logged on within the actual app so that dialogue becomes smoother and more instant. As opposed to the usual “I’ll check that on the bus, read it, then reply when I’m ignoring the washing up two hours later”. Which is NOT how to make a gal feel special.

Worst Feature – Blockless. Although you can block users from contacting you, their profile still remains on your “radar” and so your exes face will be smiling up at you no matter how many buttons you press. Tears on your smartphone screen do not a happy lesbian make, but Daatch’s “Relationship Mode” helpfully enables users to stay live while in a relationship, making the exes presence on it even more deliriously painful as she showcases pictures of her and her new girlfriend getting cats or matching tattoos. How soothing.

Overall – PoF ranks you with your fellow lady-loving-ladies via your answers to a generic questionnaire, then matches you with those it feels are best suited interest and goal-wise.

Best Feature – Their “Near You” section, which via the app allows you to see how many lesbians are in your area at any given time. Like almost as an actual chart or map. It’s incredible. As well as allowing me to spend many a fun night GPS tracking the future love-of-my-life, this feature is also very handy for seeing who lives locally and most active online.

Worst Feature – Their “You both like the same films and are therefore soulmates” fast-food approach to dating is slightly off base. Also, Not Bisexual Friendly. You have to pick whether you’re in to men or women, as the brain-trust over at PoF have clearly decided that your bisexual ways should not be tolerated on the internet (even though that’s probably where they started).

Overall – It’s beastly boasting about “Behavioural Matchmaking” makes you feel like a stud dog and it’s promise to allow you to “Browse profiles for free” before paying sends us straight to the Close Window button. This outdated and almost specifically un-LBGT-friendly app is about as much fun as stabbing yourself repeatedly in the eye with the pointy end of your rainbow coloured flag.

Worst Feature – It will connect you to Facebook, and although it won’t tell your Wall about it, you will be used in their side-ways marketing scheme via undersöka denna webbplats use of the “your friend is using Zoosk” sponsored plugs in your friend’s New Feed. Not cool, Zoosk. Not cool at all. I do not want my God-Mother or Vicar knowing I am trawling for women on the internet. It’s far more fun getting drunk and telling them myself at weddings.

Well, Tinder is the internet equivalent of this phenomenon

So there you have it, the best and worst of the bunch. Now don’t be discouraged! At the end of the day if the right woman is out there, no amount of firewall settings or horribly set up matching algorithms are going to keep you apart. So have at it and Happy Homo-Hunting.

Post a Comment