=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. YouDate.net Assessment — Old School Dating Site – On The Web Hookup Websites – JNO Construction & Design

At JNO Construction we don’t build houses, we build homes.

Call us on (310) 363-7980

Los Angeles, CA  

Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM

Top
Image Alt

YouDate.net Assessment — Old School Dating Site – On The Web Hookup Websites

YouDate.net Assessment — Old School Dating Site – On The Web Hookup Websites

by
Uncategorized

youdates.net Review — Old-school Dating Site – Using The Internet Hookup Websites

We lately carried out an entire report about the YouDate.net platform to find out whether the old-school design nevertheless operates today or if — like some decrepit old left behind college building — it must you should be ruined and demolished.

YouDate.net Assessment Results

  • Popularity –

    41

  • Appreciate –

    67

  • Attributes –

    40

  • Top-notch Members –

    41

  • Protection –

    56

  • Customer Satisfaction –

    43


Final Word on YouDate.net

When we made a decision to take a look at YouDate we had been in private rooting for this. We desired to have the ability to say, “hey, YouDate is old-school chic that delivers outcomes.”

Sadly, we cannot point out that. YouDate just does not provide the kinds of effects that contemporary web daters should be in a position to effectively satisfy compatible lovers.

We have to speed YouDate as

POOR

.

— advantages and disadvantages —

Professionals

  • Genuinely absolve to use
  • Actually quite easy enrollment procedure
  • Detailed profile options

Drawbacks

  • No mobile programs, not mobile-friendly
  • Existence of some phony profiles
  • Regional search filter very incorrect
  • Antiquated appear and feel

— In-Depth YouDate.net Assessment —

Based on your age, you are likely to or may not recall the means online dating sites was once back the 90s or very early 2000s. The programs were slightly clunky, their own visual was far from modern-day — yet they were innovative enough to help deliver many individuals with each other.

YouDate.net is actually a dating website that harkens back, at the least within its appearance, into the “classic times.”

You might be inquiring, “why would I also think about some old school site when I can use a far more modern online dating app?”

While it’s correct that modern-day matchmaking apps are light-years in front of the internet dating platforms of yesteryear, you will find some old school web sites with was able to keep their quaint allure while upgrading key aspects of their site to keep pertinent. Is actually YouDate.net these types of a dating web site?

— Very First Impression —

We should begin by proclaiming that if you should be sensitive to antiquated-looking internet sites, you might have an EpiPen available to you before visiting YouDate.net. From its welcome web page to its enrollment type to its inside platform, the entire site seems 15 to 20 years outdated. It sort of reminded us of if you see someone on the street dressed in 1990s manner. Guy, where did you get those double-pleated khaki Dockers?

Since we are really not shallow, we overlooked the looks of the website and proceeded to join up for a free account observe just what YouDate.net provides under the hood.

— Registration Process —

To register for an account on YouDate, all you have to carry out is actually submit the shape that will be found above-the-fold throughout the right-hand area of the welcome web page. The info that is required of you is actually minimal. It includes your desired login name, password, email, time of beginning, and place.

Additionally there is a simple CAPTCHA you have to enter if your wanting to’re allowed to click on the sign-up key.

Our very own most significant surprise during registration had been that YouDate.net does not require brand-new registrants to click a verification link delivered to all of them via email.

Really, the enrollment process is available. While convenient, it really is somewhat worrisome because it opens the YouDate platform to misuse.

— Audience —

YouDate is actually an over-all purpose dating site. Which means it doesn’t focus on a specific market, demographic or ethnicity. The website is advertised as a 100 percent free platform for unmarried people of any age and sexual orientations looking to fulfill associates for informal or long-lasting relationships. Its account base is actually worldwide.

— Would It Be Really Free? —

The term “free” is employed with these types of freedom today that the great majority on the population happens to be desensitized to it. After all, whenever something is advertised as “free” and only minutes later on you happen to be given options for a paid update, it really is just as if the phrase “free” not any longer features value or objective.

In the example of YouDate, “free” happens to imply truly free of charge. People get access to all popular features of the site free of charge. The website is monetized of the existence of marketing and advertising.

— creating a Profile —

To be able to grow your profile on YouDate.net, you will need to experience several displays finishing questions relating to such things as the religion, sign of the zodiac, looks, education, income, etc. All of this is performed through a series of checkboxes and drop-down solutions. It is possible to upload photos for others observe if they open your own profile page.

Considering that YouDate is actually a no cost web site, it had been wonderful to see which they make a genuine work at supplying in-depth pages on their people.

The content which you supply on your own profile is what is cross-referenced by the website’s s.e. whenever different users are seeking users with certain attributes and features.

Yes, truly a simplistic kind look in comparison to internet dating apps with elegant algos, nevertheless can still produce effects —at the very least theoretically.

— Could It Possibly Be Mobile-Friendly? —

Becoming a classic college website, YouDate does not have any indigenous mobile applications. The site isn’t also mobile-friendly. It lacks the receptive concept must get access to it on a mobile internet browser without having to turn to endless horizontal scrolling and grabbing observe its contents. Our advice will be merely use YouDate on a desktop internet browser.

— Consumer Experience —

The user experience on YouDate fell in short supply of what we should had wished locate. We were willing to take small issues about the aged concept and basic back-end architecture, but we were however looking to have a halfway good user experience.

It was not that user experience obtained by our very own testers was actually awful, just that it did not meet some basic benchmarks. As an example, even when you should have the ability to customize your hunt results by location to find regional fits, this never ever worked precisely. Our very own testers held getting good results from all around the world. If you live in Fresno and your recommended matches are all from Boston, New York, Europe, Asia, and Africa, it’s likely that opting for a cup of coffee that afternoon will be tough.

In addition, our testers held obtaining sporadic private emails from females that, upon evaluation, descends from fake pages. These fake pages aren’t respected, however they are present regarding the program. They were not maintained by the web site by itself. To phrase it differently, they certainly weren’t being used to upsell you on stuff. Most likely, the website doesn’t have anything to upsell. It seemed to us these particular phony profiles belonged to third-parties marketing outside dating and sex sites, trolls, catfish, and fraudsters.

SHARE

RELATED POSTS

by

by

by