=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. mikГ¤ on paras postimyynti morsiamen palvelu – JNO Construction & Design https://www.jnoconstruction.com Comprehensive Design, Build & Renovation Services for the Los Angeles Area Sun, 19 Jan 2025 04:12:55 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.16 https://www.jnoconstruction.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-JNO-Favicon-32x32.png mikГ¤ on paras postimyynti morsiamen palvelu – JNO Construction & Design https://www.jnoconstruction.com 32 32 I’ve been regarding the relationship routine taking place 2 yrs today https://www.jnoconstruction.com/i-ve-been-regarding-the-relationship-routine/ https://www.jnoconstruction.com/i-ve-been-regarding-the-relationship-routine/#respond Sun, 19 Jan 2025 04:12:13 +0000 https://www.jnoconstruction.com/?p=67674 I’ve been regarding the relationship routine taking place 2 yrs today

Easily answered in a number of sleazy sexual method, the discussion went on normally!

mail order brides from india

Ohhhhhh Lordy! However it is literally out of personal choosing because the I’m looking away you to everytime I think a guy might be pretty awesome, the guy up-and does one thing extremely unusual, like: We went to the bathroom in the exact middle of dinner and gotten a book out-of my day you to definitely see, Are you currently pooping? Another gentleman explained he was powering from the Italian no as the guy snitched for the anybody. I additionally got yet another fresh fruit loop tell me the guy loved me ten min as we came across. I’ve been informed the time there is certainly some one are if you’re perhaps not actually searching. Very We have kept you to definitely test upwards for approximately six months today and certainly will show the way it happens lol. I am almost certain I might feel a lonely dated woman with 5 pet and you may dining a may away from Beenie Weenies haha.

Definitely the newest PUAs interested in casual sex could keep they upwards because they don’t proper care if perhaps one in 50 feminine answer the clipped and you will paste rubbish if this becomes them a one evening remain

I’m a keen English big, profit copywriter and you may published writer, and you will can offer me (about in some stadiums! We estimate that we wasted regarding 30,000 terminology every informed, and had regarding 2 feedback regarding 100. Exactly what left myself heading I’m not sure, specific https://kissbridesdate.com/fi/blogi/maailman-kauneimmat-naiset maybe unsuspecting trust that sooner or later I would personally be capable introduce experience of anybody intriguing and after that go ahead to satisfy anyone a small best with a standpoint so you can maybe meeting. I dislike the new nice man material offered however, I’m a good real and you may believe We deserved better than for a lot of innovative, well said and you can respectful messages simply flat out forgotten. Zero, nobody owes me things toward an online dating site but those who usually do not show me prominent through regarding actual world including bother me!

So i experimented with a research and you can written an alternative profile playing with a list design people, just a face picture. We created a good vapid and you may discreetly misogynistic character, and place it, and messaged most females with haphazard hi and you will hi! To a few women’s borrowing from the bank, I did not rating replies off the, but I’d much more replies in two circumstances than just We had in two decades with my real reputation, funnily adequate mostly of profiles which were in the highest enemy percentage. I had a stream of female merely delivering Me messages, not really waiting for us to message all of them. All since We looked like a masculine model. Some thing passed away during the me personally with this particular experiment and i also removed my profile away from OKC.

My personal fake character continues to be taking messages… and many of your own women are providing disappointed given that We have not messaged all of them once more, I am aware, as they have messaged once more to inquire of me personally as to the reasons I haven’t replied ?? Profile pulled eventually… Most of the ladies users state Where have all the great dudes moved? I believe disappointed to your feminine on these internet sites prepared fruitlessly due to their non-existent dream men to look away from narrow the net, when i consider these dream guys was due to the fact non-existent because the my personal (I was thinking really without a doubt) bogus character.

For this reason I have had it that have matchmaking I do not consider the website produces much of a distinction. I believe online dating overall keeps virtually unsuccessful both males and females, you hear specific triumph tales, nevertheless number of articles in this way, and also the combat of words towards having it poor (women or men etc) suggests there are a great number of unhappy on the web daters available to choose from. Just like the individuals told you over, it’s better to participate organizations, forge friendships, do situations you like, of course you ought to see somoene you mouse click with upcoming higher, however, delight, cannot begin browsing things and you may striking for the somebody every day. Some people would like to collect stamps or play volleyball or decide for guides!

]]> https://www.jnoconstruction.com/i-ve-been-regarding-the-relationship-routine/feed/ 0