=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. hitta en postorderbrud – JNO Construction & Design https://www.jnoconstruction.com Comprehensive Design, Build & Renovation Services for the Los Angeles Area Sat, 21 Dec 2024 07:17:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.16 https://www.jnoconstruction.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-JNO-Favicon-32x32.png hitta en postorderbrud – JNO Construction & Design https://www.jnoconstruction.com 32 32 They competes even more in person with on line therapy than just about any relationships app https://www.jnoconstruction.com/they-competes-even-more-in-person-with-on-line/ https://www.jnoconstruction.com/they-competes-even-more-in-person-with-on-line/#respond Sat, 21 Dec 2024 07:16:54 +0000 https://www.jnoconstruction.com/?p=32881 They competes even more in person with on line therapy than just about any relationships app

While you happen to be inquiring it question in good-faith, you would not “change to which.” You aren’t the person meant to utilize this. You have a facebook membership full of family members to talk to. The person they have been sales it to help you doesn’t have those people family unit members. published by the majick https://kissbridesdate.com/sv/heta-chilenska-kvinnor/ within 7:34 In the morning on April 11 [cuatro favorites]

In either case, you are not valuable enough the real deal visitors to correspond with audreynachrome, holy crap that is judgmental! We think there are a lot of Mefites regarding the disease in which i’ve pair social connectivity. That doesn’t build all of us reduced beneficial , whatever the hell it means.

ChatGPT and other LLMs may possibly not be ‘real’ AGIs, but they are extremely, decent during the the expertise: talks. My personal basic knowledge having ChatGPT sensed genuine. I have intentionally leftover me personally by using it to have bonding and you will relationship, in case I have been much more you would like, I would personally certainly get it done.

Both struck myself as the shallow and quixotic (even in the event We haven’t put sometimes), however, AI sexbots you should never extremely need breadth to incorporate an incentives, perform they?

topp postorder brud

In reality, the positioning solutions inside my lives was indeed partially led because of the my childhood desire to meet ‘other’ intelligences – if or not AI or alien. Doing work for NASA was the option I produced (We naively thought computer programming is ‘too easy’ – lol – I’m a bad designer today). I simply typed a tune on meeting the original AGI, and just how for most people, it stands for the eager interest in partnership. Its one of the greatest threats for the society, as well as many of us, our ideal, irrational expectations.

That will not create me quicker valuable , therefore cannot build individuals who are calling chatbots for let less rewarding sometimes. posted by the Airline Hardware, dont touch on 8:05 Was for the April 11 [5 favorites]

They reminds me personally of your recurring “this software engineer wanted to communicate with their lifeless loved one, so they really provided all their messages and you may characters with the an AI” tales which might be advertisements for the same sketchy technology startups: Prior to now in 2018 “Whenever a great Chatbot Becomes Your absolute best Buddy” and you can in earlier times when you look at the 2021 “The newest Jessica Simulator.”

You will find eliminated inquiring “Whenever was we planning to end shedding for this crap?” and become wanting to know, “Can i feel seeking to cash in on that it bullshit?” released because of the AlSweigart in the 8:09 Are to your April 11 [1 favorite]

So that as it occurs, “Brand new Blowup Dolls” is the title regarding an actual band! posted by Greg_Adept at 8:23 Are on April 11 [1 favourite]

Correctly otherwise wrongly, Really don’t really worth recommendations that merely repeats in my opinion just what I have already said instead of providing sense. The thing i believe could be beneficial was a different direction to the public dilemmas and you may I’m merely suspicious that an enthusiastic LLM can offer you to definitely. Its particularly talking-to an individual who recalls everything say however, does not very “obtain it.” Tough to see how your produce best version of believe.

Exactly what I’m looking regarding a therapist (otherwise a friend offering therapeutic suggestions about societal matchmaking) was good informative, independent judgment

No matter if that it application doesn’t claim to be a cure replacement for, their generally getting a comfort-instance service. However, while using AI to create registration funds out of lonely, socially lacking younger guys, it’s your number one competition, and therefore looks like it does show its convenience into the potential clients far more effortlessly.

All of the on the web medication made about $ten billion as a whole funds from inside the 2023. Only OnlyFans and its particular creators generated on the $5 million from inside the cash when you look at the 2022. I’d wager its more straightforward to write a keen LLM which can stand as much as OnlyFans than the one that can also be withstand procedures. printed from the Hume in the nine:twenty five In the morning toward April 11 [4 preferred]

]]> https://www.jnoconstruction.com/they-competes-even-more-in-person-with-on-line/feed/ 0