=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. beste postordre brudeside – JNO Construction & Design https://www.jnoconstruction.com Comprehensive Design, Build & Renovation Services for the Los Angeles Area Sat, 18 Jan 2025 14:27:35 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.16 https://www.jnoconstruction.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-JNO-Favicon-32x32.png beste postordre brudeside – JNO Construction & Design https://www.jnoconstruction.com 32 32 And that i ended up being toward a Religious relationships podcast a few months ago therefore we chatted about so it https://www.jnoconstruction.com/and-that-i-ended-up-being-toward-a-religious/ https://www.jnoconstruction.com/and-that-i-ended-up-being-toward-a-religious/#respond Sat, 18 Jan 2025 14:25:22 +0000 https://www.jnoconstruction.com/?p=67086 And that i ended up being toward a Religious relationships podcast a few months ago therefore we chatted about so it

Including for individuals who came across in the a road other individuals avoid otherwise at the a las vegas gambling establishment, I know that the success rate ones relationship could be pretty crappy

Jean Chatzky: () Very on the book, you discuss the simple fact that there clearly was a study out-of Stanford College or university one to discovers that you to definitely-year break up speed having lovers just who fulfill online is more than to possess lovers which fulfill various other implies. And i also question exactly what that’s from the. Due to the fact certainly such couples make a connection. They’re just not while making as frequently off a lasting commitment. What exactly do your comprehend on one to?

Jon Birger: () Well, I would like to preface they from the stating, browse, I am aware that not the off-line technique for meeting some body are perfect. Therefore i should not signify instance most of the real world way of conference anyone is the most suitable, nevertheless wide variety I’m going to run-through will be suggests that we endorse from inside the Create your Move. Along with his data, he says the latest success rate otherwise separation prices of, the guy generally says how somebody meet was, in his conditions, very little dependent on how they meet. The break up costs aren’t much influenced. But in my personal look at, all this hinges on the method that you identify very little. If you glance at the appendix out-of their studies, he found that the one-year breakup rate to possess partners who see on the net is 16%pare you to definitely so you can nine% for partners whom fulfill compliment of friends, 8% was residents, 6% are colleagues, that is the best, 1% for individuals who fulfill during the church. And that i consider it had been cuatro% or 5% for people who found within the stages school or senior high school, that we get a hold of fascinating since my personal literary broker, she and her husband found inside the 3rd amount. I always think of their own each time We observe that fact.

Thus, very predicated on Michael Rosenfeld, that a teacher on Stanford, which in reality, you understand, publicly could have been fairly confident into the internet dating

Jean Chatzky: () Better, do we simply explore church having another? I am talking about, I think everybody hearing is going to return to, you understand, individuals are browsing come across religion centered on which fact. What’s one? I am talking about, I do believe I could imagine, right? It’s, it’s this shared trust and cost program, correct?

Jon Birger: () I really don’t thought it is more about God and you may trust. In my opinion it is more about mutual passions and you may common beliefs. And that i made an effort to form of carry it carefully while they did not have to diminish the fresh faith element of it. However, I believe my quip are, okay whether or not it are a group, if it is actually a great birdwatching club, and you got for example 30 people who love doing birdwatching and you may every had the same passion and you can opinions, it might be more comfortable for those people to connect also, exactly the same way it’s to possess good Mormon or an enthusiastic evangelical Religious otherwise a beneficial devout Jew otherwise a great devout Muslim. It is these mutual hobbies and you may common values which might be variety of the newest mortar into the relationship. It isn’t necessarily the newest faith aspect in kind of.

Jean Chatzky: () Well, and even low-devout Jews otherwise low-devout Muslims, best? I mean, From the once i relocated to Nyc, you will find a temple inside the New york additionally the scrub are, check out Monday night features. If you head to Monday night properties, you’re going to meet people. It was a change congregation. It wasn’t, you realize, an Orthodox otherwise an excellent Hasidic sect. It absolutely was reformed Jews, you understand, vocal for the Monday evening and you will while making suits. And i also believe towards extremely reason why you happen to be these are. You are aware, I don’t need to simply take you off and you will say that is the best way. But I do believe, In my opinion the fresh new coworker topic, whenever I first started performing at the NBC, there are each one of these Now Reveal marriages. There was indeed at Forbes, whenever i was at Forbes, there have been a few of these Forbes marriages. And i also imagine that’s acquired complicated. You understand, you aren’t very meant to sexy Pakistansk kvinner big date those who possess people particular power over your job.

]]> https://www.jnoconstruction.com/and-that-i-ended-up-being-toward-a-religious/feed/ 0