=== Classic Editor === Contributors: wordpressdotorg, azaozz, melchoyce, chanthaboune, alexislloyd, pento, youknowriad, desrosj, luciano-croce Tags: gutenberg, disable, disable gutenberg, editor, classic editor, block editor Requires at least: 4.9 Tested up to: 6.2 Stable tag: 1.6.3 Requires PHP: 5.2.4 License: GPLv2 or later License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html Enables the previous "classic" editor and the old-style Edit Post screen with TinyMCE, Meta Boxes, etc. Supports all plugins that extend this screen. == Description == Classic Editor is an official plugin maintained by the WordPress team that restores the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and the "Edit Post" screen. It makes it possible to use plugins that extend that screen, add old-style meta boxes, or otherwise depend on the previous editor. Classic Editor is an official WordPress plugin, and will be fully supported and maintained until 2024, or as long as is necessary. At a glance, this plugin adds the following: * Administrators can select the default editor for all users. * Administrators can allow users to change their default editor. * When allowed, the users can choose which editor to use for each post. * Each post opens in the last editor used regardless of who edited it last. This is important for maintaining a consistent experience when editing content. In addition, the Classic Editor plugin includes several filters that let other plugins control the settings, and the editor choice per post and per post type. By default, this plugin hides all functionality available in the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). == Changelog == = 1.6.3 = * Added some WPCS fixes, props NicktheGeek on GitHub. * Updated "Tested up to" in the readme and removed it from classic-editor.php. This should fix false positive errors in security plugins in the future. = 1.6.2 = * Fixed bug that was preventing saving of the last used editor. = 1.6.1 = * Fixed a warning on the block editor based widgets screen. * Fixed use of a deprecated filter. = 1.6 = * Updated for WordPress 5.5. * Fixed minor issues with calling deprecated functions, needlessly registering uninstall hook, and capitalization of some strings. = 1.5 = * Updated for WordPress 5.2 and Gutenberg 5.3. * Enhanced and fixed the "open posts in the last editor used to edit them" logic. * Fixed adding post state so it can easily be accessed from other plugins. = 1.4 = * On network installations removed the restriction for only network activation. * Added support for network administrators to choose the default network-wide editor. * Fixed the settings link in the warning on network About screen. * Properly added the "Switch to classic editor" menu item to the block editor menu. = 1.3 = * Fixed removal of the "Try Gutenberg" dashboard widget. * Fixed condition for displaying of the after upgrade notice on the "What's New" screen. Shown when the classic editor is selected and users cannot switch editors. = 1.2 = * Fixed switching editors from the Add New (post) screen before a draft post is saved. * Fixed typo that was appending the edit URL to the `classic-editor` query var. * Changed detecting of WordPress 5.0 to not use version check. Fixes a bug when testing 5.1-alpha. * Changed the default value of the option to allow users to switch editors to false. * Added disabling of the Gutenberg plugin and lowered the required WordPress version to 4.9. * Added `classic_editor_network_default_settings` filter. = 1.1 = Fixed a bug where it may attempt to load the block editor for post types that do not support editor when users are allowed to switch editors. = 1.0 = * Updated for WordPress 5.0. * Changed all "Gutenberg" names/references to "block editor". * Refreshed the settings UI. * Removed disabling of the Gutenberg plugin. This was added for testing in WordPress 4.9. Users who want to continue following the development of Gutenberg in WordPress 5.0 and beyond will not need another plugin to disable it. * Added support for per-user settings of default editor. * Added support for admins to set the default editor for the site. * Added support for admins to allow users to change their default editor. * Added support for network admins to prevent site admins from changing the default settings. * Added support to store the last editor used for each post and open it next time. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added "post editor state" in the listing of posts on the Posts screen. Shows the editor that will be opened for the post. Enabled when users can choose default editor. * Added `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post` and `classic_editor_enabled_editors_for_post_type` filters. Can be used by other plugins to control or override the editor used for a particular post of post type. * Added `classic_editor_plugin_settings` filter. Can be used by other plugins to override the settings and disable the settings UI. = 0.5 = * Updated for Gutenberg 4.1 and WordPress 5.0-beta1. * Removed some functionality that now exists in Gutenberg. * Fixed redirecting back to the classic editor after looking at post revisions. = 0.4 = * Fixed removing of the "Try Gutenberg" call-out when the Gutenberg plugin is not activated. * Fixed to always show the settings and the settings link in the plugins list table. * Updated the readme text. = 0.3 = * Updated the option from a checkbox to couple of radio buttons, seems clearer. Thanks to @designsimply for the label text suggestions. * Some general updates and cleanup. = 0.2 = * Update for Gutenberg 1.9. * Remove warning and automatic deactivation when Gutenberg is not active. = 0.1 = Initial release. == Frequently Asked Questions == = Default settings = When activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will restore the previous ("classic") WordPress editor and hide the new block editor ("Gutenberg"). These settings can be changed at the Settings => Writing screen. = Default settings for network installation = There are two options: * When network-activated and when using a classic (non-block) theme, this plugin will set the classic editor as default and prevent site administrators and users from changing editors. The settings can be changed and default network-wide editor can be selected on the Network Settings screen. * When not network-activated each site administrator will be able to activate the plugin and choose options for their users. = Cannot find the "Switch to classic editor" link = It is in the main block editor menu, see this [screenshot](https://ps.w.org/classic-editor/assets/screenshot-7.png?rev=2023480). = Does this work with full site editing and block themes? = No, as block themes rely on blocks. [See Block themes article](https://wordpress.org/support/article/block-themes/) for more information. == Screenshots == 1. Admin settings on the Settings -> Writing screen. 2. User settings on the Profile screen. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 3. "Action links" to choose alternative editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 4. Link to switch to the block editor while editing a post in the classic editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 5. Link to switch to the classic editor while editing a post in the block editor. Visible when the users are allowed to switch editors. 6. Network settings to select the default editor for the network and allow site admins to change it. 7. The "Switch to classic editor" link. a mail order bride – JNO Construction & Design https://www.jnoconstruction.com Comprehensive Design, Build & Renovation Services for the Los Angeles Area Fri, 03 Jan 2025 21:10:30 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.16 https://www.jnoconstruction.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-JNO-Favicon-32x32.png a mail order bride – JNO Construction & Design https://www.jnoconstruction.com 32 32 SeniorsMeet Reduced Dating website Opinion: Not Really worth the Currency or Stress https://www.jnoconstruction.com/seniorsmeet-reduced-dating-website-opinion-not/ https://www.jnoconstruction.com/seniorsmeet-reduced-dating-website-opinion-not/#respond Fri, 03 Jan 2025 21:08:48 +0000 https://www.jnoconstruction.com/?p=50993 SeniorsMeet Reduced Dating website Opinion: Not Really worth the Currency or Stress

In the end, I experienced to contact my personal credit card providers so you can cut-off the brand new payment. It had been an enormous issues, therefore however left an adverse preference inside my lips. It’s just not really worth the issues.

This site is the most those paid down ones, you realize, the ones that charge you a fairly penny merely to subscribe. I had to shell out regarding the $ to get in, however, I thought it might be worth every penny to locate particular nice people my personal decades to talk having. We developed an excellent profile with glamorous photos, and i also gotta state, I get an abundance of solutions. But, without a doubt, the website will not apparently worry about personalizing people’s pages on all of the. Its instance they just throw anyone inside a large pot and you can a cure for the best.

I really don’t even bother going on this site any further, it’s just useless. Without a doubt why. First off, they post me personally “matches” of males that are the alternative away from the thing i establish I’m selecting. I am talking about, come on, do in addition they realize my choice? Next, We make it clear in my reputation which i don’t want canned texts otherwise solutions off guys who don’t possess a photograph. I even place it at the conclusion of my profile thus I know whenever they read it or perhaps not. Exactly what carry out I get? Tons of processed messages and answers of men with no images. I just remove all of them while they certainly did not annoy so you’re able to comprehend my personal reputation.

And don’t actually rating me personally become with the guys whom post an equivalent canned inquiry in my experience dos, step three, and even six times. It’s such they won’t actually read they usually have already messaged myself. And what is on inane information on there? Including, exactly who cares if someone else enjoys my personal photo or who may have seen me personally or helped me popular? It’s simply dumb.

Nevertheless poor area? There are guys on the site which are unable to even spell. I mean, definitely, it is particularly they never ever graduated from the third levels. It is simply unfortunate.

SeniorsMeet Discouraging Selection and you can Terrible Filtering: My Expertise in SeniorsMeet

how much do vietnamese mail order brides cost

I was playing with SeniorsMeet as , and i also need say, I am fairly distressed into group of men you to definitely their selection program chooses personally. What i’m saying is, I shell out decent money for it service, and that i anticipate more than just what I’m providing. Daily, I’m delivered 3-5 matches, but they never even come alongside Pamplona women for marriage fitting my profile standards. A lot of them try out of state, such as step 1-step three,000 distant. As well as the dudes obtained selected for me personally are just not good a great matches. They have been different ethnicities, some other religions, too-short (around 5’6″), too old (in their 80s), and also have various other welfare than simply me.

I won’t recommend SeniorsMeet in order to somebody, particularly when you are interested in a no cost dating internet site

We have demonstrably specified just what I’m looking for in my own basic and you can state-of-the-art search and you will reputation, but the guys they publish myself don’t matches my research conditions anyway. Of course We attempt to carry out the browse myself, I usually have the exact same individuals who I gotten whenever i come. Its challenging.

And every day I go on the website, I have found one my data or needs was basically changed. I does not have to put in this post every time I go onto the website. One-man on my potential applicants are found guilty to own adding themselves so you’re able to younger girls into a few occasions. And something people which i performed satisfy was hitched four minutes and you can seems to have a primary every day ingesting disease. I clearly stated to my profile that i wasn’t interested inside alcohol consumption on a regular basis, however, one pointers is actually taken from my profile.

]]> https://www.jnoconstruction.com/seniorsmeet-reduced-dating-website-opinion-not/feed/ 0